We reported this when the problem came out.

Years later they still haven't fixed this and what I was seeing on the
Ubiquiti forums (before they broke them) was that they were very
uninterested in 900 Mhz improvements.

My limited experience with old Motorola/Cambium 900 Mhz wasn't that good
either.

But I have to use Rocket M9s for a link to my house and it's functional
with old firmware.  But it could be better.

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 5:51 PM <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just to add to this, we have had this same issue for over 2 years now. I
> have worked with Ubiquiti support and no good solution has been found. The
> issue I was led to believe is hardware (processor) related and Ubiquiti has
> no intention of upgrading this product. I have heard rumors about end of
> life but seen nothing official. If you search the UBTN user forums you can
> find this issue being discussed as far back as 2016.
>
>
>
> I have found that if you regress back to firmware
> XM.v5.6.15-sign-cpu400.31612.170908.1458.bin on both the AP and the sta(s)
> and you utilize ping watchdog on both the AP and all sta(s) you can
> mitigate the issue but that’s as good as it is going to get (You do lose
> UNMS functionality).
>
>
>
> Unfortunately for us, we have 10 AP’s and somewhere north of 35 stations
> in service (very heavy tree and foliage issues in rural Florida) and
> constant complaints regarding service drops is a daily issue and has been
> for a few years.
>
>
>
> If someone has a better resolution I too would like to hear it. I have
> seriously considered Cambium (excellent product) as it appears to be the
> only other 900mhz (unlicensed) NLOS product out there and is supported well
>  however the $3000+ AP cost just destroys any link justifications.
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: Online Pro] <http://onlinepro.x10.bz/>
>
>
>
> Joe Buck - NCE /
> E2-02097
> 13 Emerald Circle
>
>  CTO
> Ormond Beach, Fla. 32174
>
>
>
>
>
> [email protected]
>                                                                               
>                          tel:
> 386-401-6825
>
> IM: 68002132
> (ICQ)
>      fax: 386-401-6830
>
> AIM:
> kc7kp
> cell: 812-760-4293
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/joebuck
>
> skype: joe.buckiii
>
> http://cbn.network
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> *On Behalf Of *Robert Dillon
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 21, 2020 5:40 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] 900 disconnect issue
>
>
>
> We have this happen all too often also.  And totally agree with the broken
> bandaid that the watchdog provides.  We have found that if we replace the
> bad radio sometimes once and sometimes twice or more we'll eventually find
> a new in-box radio that works without the drops.  Its terrible but that's
> what it comes down to.
>
>
>
> We are looking for a new solution as well.  We only use 900 in small cell
> repeater scenarios where no way around the foliage so what Tommy does with
> Cambium PMP 900 is too expensive for us for that application.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
>
> From: Clay Stewart <[email protected]>
>
> Date: 1/21/20 4:57 PM (GMT-05:00)
>
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group <[email protected]>
>
> Subject: [Ubnt_users] 900 disconnect issue
>
>
>
> For several weeks now, or longer, random 900 APs drop all customers and
> have to be rebooted to get them back. Setting WatchDog is NOT a solution,
> it only has customers interrupted often, and not down till a reboot.
>
>
>
> It does not seem to matter which OS we use.
>
>
>
> Has anyone found a solution?
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to