On 12/11/2007, Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > On Sunday 11 November 2007 00:10:26 Who wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Does sabdfl still read this list? Some of these questions here may > > only be able to be answered by him (or kwwii - are you employed to > > work on this at the moment?). After some deliberation I've copied him > > in. Sorry Mark if you don't think you needed to be! > > Yes, I am employed to work on this. > > > It's really cool to see this list alive again with so many ideas and > > discussions - some of the stuff looks really sweet, I wish I had more > > time to contribute (though I think the standard's getting well beyond > > me!). > > Indeed, it is nice to see people stepping up and showing interest in the > artwork community. Hopefully we can turn this positive energy into great > contributions. > > > While there's still so much energy around I think we need to get some > > more definition of what the goals of the artwork team are here so we > > can channel it in the right direction. I hope I haven't missed > > anything about what exactly is being worked towards...I haven't been > > keeping up with ALL the list mail recently and couldn't make the > > meetings, but I couldn't see a clear description of goals or process > > (emails like 'how far for Hardy' have gone unanswered... and > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtTeam which supposedly contains UDS > > conclusions is not very detailed) The minutes of the latest meeting > > say in response to a question about what we will be changing: > > The blueprint from UDS was a starting point. We discussed these issues > (you'll > find that discussion on the appropriate wiki page under BOF and > Discussion). > In the meantime several issues have come up which need clarification > before > we can finalize the blueprint for real use. > > > "Nov 01 18:47:53 <kwwii> install screen, usplash, gdm/face broswer, > > Desktop Wallpaper, GTK theme, colors, metacity/emerald theme, icons, > > splash screens" > > > > That sounds mighty exciting, and a lot of what I am asking below has > > clearly been discussed (from the minutes again) > > > > "Nov 01 18:03:47 <kwwii> we had a meeting at UDS today > > Nov 01 18:04:07 <kwwii> and talked about the form of the art team > and > > how we lead the process" > > > > But I'm not sure enough info has made its way here yet. Maybe it has, > > sorry if I've missed it. > > Until now the only information on the wiki is under: > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy > > If you look at that link you will see that the official guidelines for > contribution are forthcoming. Part of the guidelines will be the exact > process for contributions. As this is the first occurrence of the process > in > this form I want to get it right - being hasty and posting something that > is > not well considered would only cause more problems than it would solve.
Any progress on official guidelines? That page states that the next meeting is 1st of November... :-) Cheers, Mikkel
-- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
