On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 07:32 -0500, Salane Ashcraft wrote: > This is not a progression. It isn't even that different. The problem > with Ubuntu isn't the color, which has been made worse with this > Alpha. Its the widget style, which is flat and outdated. Its the > fonts, which need to be updated and can be done so with open source > fonts. Its the icons, which look like something designed for Playskool > OS. Its the presentation. I will never stop using Ubuntu, but really, > if we want this to be Linux for Humans, shouldn't we make it look as > best as possible?
I think you are being a bit harsh considering this is a very early version of the theme. I don't particularly like it as it is now either, but there is plenty of time for it to improve! Personally I like the current icons. With the exception of the folder icons which i've always felt seem a bit too shiny compared to all the other icons. > > > I am getting involved. I am learning all I can to bring my theme to > life, but it will change yet again. I am going with a lighter color > than its current golden brown, perhaps something whiter. > > > Could someone explain to me how pixmap themes work? > > > Salane > > > >
-- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
