On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 23:01 +0100, Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote: > Yes I know and you're right. For this I had a eye since I did my fist > drawings with 5 years. :D > The top is absolute correct. The bottom is only a little bit wrong. > But > it's really so important? Isn't it better to have a correct line [1] > which is better for the small sizes? So the Icon is almost seen in > 24x24px. In 48x48px (AWN) you won't see the little difference in the > perspective, too. The line [1] is here better, too. > I will let it so how it is and ignore the perspective. ;) > In big things, like Wallis, the correct perspective is a must.
I do think it is important. It is reasonable to make compromises on the small sizes, since the lines are short there, making such issues less obvious. You should _perhaps_ go with a projection with parallel lines there, though. But it should be correct on the large size. Otherwise it looks like it was created by someone without a clue of what he was doing ;) -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
