On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Oliver Scholtz 1 <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 15.03.2009, 10:49 +0100 schrieb Thorsten Wilms: >> On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 03:41 +0100, Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote: >> > Thorsten, >> > >> > One solution is ... >> > >> > Letting it down in their perspective and correct it from above. >> >> Yes, generally making it so that you have optimal angles for at least >> one edge, rest all in correct perspective, is likely a good idea. As >> long as it doesn't interfere with the composition, which doesn't seem to >> be the case here. >> >> >> -- >> Thorsten Wilms >> >> thorwil's design for free software: >> http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ >> >> > > So I fixed it. I let the old one for differencing. Every little change > entails a lot of changing parameters. So it's better have it always > right the first time. > But nobody is perfect ... so the base box was from the sources of > Oxygen. :) > > I think I can continue now with scaling. > > Greetings to Germany ;) > > Sincerly Oliver Scholtz > > > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >
I like it better now. Great job! :) Smartboy -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
