El 17/09/2009, a las 20:06, "Cory K." <[email protected]> escribió:
> Cory K. wrote: >> Ok. Here we are 1 week later. LOTS of stuff happenin' in my personal >> life so I beg everyone's humble forgiveness as I try to get this >> train >> going again. >> >> So, let me clue in everyone to what Daniel has done so we can all >> be on >> the same page. >> With Breathe installed, use this: >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Breathe-Edit_0.10.tar.gz >> >> This is a set that includes Daniel's edits and inherits Breathe.. Now >> while the color consistency is striking, overwhelmingly, people I >> showed >> them to felt they were bland. The liked the strength of the base set, >> but felt that the consistency saw better with Daniel's edits. So, we >> need to achieve some sort of balance. >> >> Here's where the folks on the list chime in. Keep it informative and >> please no unhelpful "I like 'em!"s. I'm thinking we can script >> Daniel's >> edits to raise the saturation a bit. But that also effects the plate >> layers. Something I'm not keen on, but, seems no way around it. >> Unless >> things can be applied to specific layers? Sound nuts? >> > > Ok. Since nobody has chimed in Daniel, Sebastian and I will have to > move > on our own. > > Sebastian - Can you chime in on what you do and don't like? It's > alot so > I know it can be hard. I just saw Daniel's message, somehow I missed it :P I'll look into the edits tomorrow with more detail, but I can said for what saw that overall I like them. > Should we just up the saturation across all the > edits? Then remove icons we don't like? Sounds good to me. -- Seba -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
