On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 14:20 +0530, Vishnoo wrote: > Why isn't this in the submissions list? : > <http://wiki.ubuntu-br.org/TimeArtwork#head-cdff2bf16ee7854db58cf2519dc2b1c99af15a90> > Any reason it was left out? > Blau Araujo mentioned it here on the mailing list on 27 Oct.
Because it's the logo of the BR-Artwork Team. I can't help it, I see 2 people pushing a giant brush into a 3rd person's face. > Would scale better and is less "busy" than the other submissions. That's a ridiculous claim, given submissions like http://www.flickr.com/photos/j_baer/5142173763/in/pool-uawt-1#/photos/j_baer/5142173763/in/pool-1507...@n25/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/55752...@n05/5196951321/in/pool-uawt-1#/photos/55752...@n05/5196951321/in/pool-1507...@n25/ > Regarding the closing date. Weren't we waiting on Ivanka's survey result > to identify the scope of this team? And there was the indecision on > whether the team should be an Ubuntu Artwork or an Ubuntu Design team? I thought the survey would be about the custom website idea? Regarding design vs artwork: That's why I asked for logo concepts that at least hint at design, which basically led to pencils and rulers instead of just brushes ;) I have no doubt that logos, icons, wallpapers and themes will stay inside the scope of the team. Questionable is if mockups and interface/interaction design should be added. Since you can't tell such a complicated story with a logo anyway, I see no issue with making a choice from where we stand now. It's not like we couldn't replace the logo again, should there ever be a better idea. -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
