On 10/26/05, Sam Liddicott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, hoary-extras are packages not in the Ubuntu archives, but rather derived from miscellaneous 3rd party packages with some level of established quality. It's an unofficial repository that happens to be maintained by the same people who do Backports.
Identical src-deb to Dapper, built against the Breezy environment.
Reinhard Tartler wrote:Doh; my confusion here, I was confusing kanotix and seveas with hoary backports.On 10/26/05, Sam Liddicott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[... freenx...]
Freenx was never backported, because it is not yet in ubuntu at all.
How does this relate toPlease could I respectfully suggest that backports src-deb are always
made available as a src-deb url in the same repository as the backports.
try this apt line:
deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hoary-backports main
restricted universe multiverse
* http://ubuntu-backports.mirrormax.net/ hoary-extras main universe multiverse restrictedis it the same stuff, but this time with source?
No, hoary-extras are packages not in the Ubuntu archives, but rather derived from miscellaneous 3rd party packages with some level of established quality. It's an unofficial repository that happens to be maintained by the same people who do Backports.
Does "backported from dapper" mean a slightly different src-deb than what built dapper? (different patches etc) or does it just mean built against breezy libs?breezy-backports wil open as soon as there have been stuff backported
from dapper. We just opened dapper.
Identical src-deb to Dapper, built against the Breezy environment.
Thanks for the good response.
Sam
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
-- ubuntu-backports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
