What do you feel about \sh's suggestion of "upgrading gnome or kde"?
Surely that'll take kdelibs or libgnome*, qt/gtk updates and such upward dependencies.
On 11/1/05, Stephan Hermann <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Guys,
Am Montag, den 31.10.2005, 11:29 -0600 schrieb Travis Watkins:
> On 10/31/05, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Give us some more information -- what's the error message? We aren't
> > psychic.
> >
>
> There is no error, he just wants to get new apps and such without
> upgrading his entire distro. Personally I'd rather get all the new
> features of GNOME and etc and upgrade but he seems to be stuck in his
> ways. He is threatening to go back to windows to try to get us to give
> him what he wants. I say let him go, we don't need greedy
> manipulators.
First of all, I think it's quite ok to ask for "new stuff" in hoary.
If it's possible to upgrade gnome or kde via ubuntu-backports let's do
it.
If it's too much efford, because of new things in gnome, which is
requiring a new toolchain etc. then you should not backport the new
crack.
But annoying people to name them "greedy manipulators" is not a good
idea. Better to stop hitting the reply button to those mails then.
Regards,
\sh
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
-- ubuntu-backports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
