Hey John, well...I was just thinking about the future ,-)
Wasn't there a BOF which should discuss point releases of gnome or kde as "dapper-updates"? Regards, \sh Am Dienstag, den 01.11.2005, 10:56 -0500 schrieb John Dong: > To the Developers listening in (or being spammed to listen in ;-) ): > > What do you feel about \sh's suggestion of "upgrading gnome or kde"? > > Surely that'll take kdelibs or libgnome*, qt/gtk updates and such > upward dependencies. > > On 11/1/05, Stephan Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Am Montag, den 31.10.2005, 11:29 -0600 schrieb Travis > Watkins: > > On 10/31/05, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Give us some more information -- what's the error message? > We aren't > > > psychic. > > > > > > > There is no error, he just wants to get new apps and such > without > > upgrading his entire distro. Personally I'd rather get all > the new > > features of GNOME and etc and upgrade but he seems to be > stuck in his > > ways. He is threatening to go back to windows to try to get > us to give > > him what he wants. I say let him go, we don't need greedy > > manipulators. > > First of all, I think it's quite ok to ask for "new stuff" in > hoary. > If it's possible to upgrade gnome or kde via ubuntu-backports > let's do > it. > If it's too much efford, because of new things in gnome, which > is > requiring a new toolchain etc. then you should not backport > the new > crack. > But annoying people to name them "greedy manipulators" is not > a good > idea. Better to stop hitting the reply button to those mails > then. > > Regards, > > \sh > > > -- > ubuntu-backports mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports > -- ubuntu-backports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
