James --
 
Everyone's getting all worked up about the delay in breezy-backports. I've already asked mdz recently about it, but he hasn't replied within 23 seconds...
 
Do you have any word on how long it'll be?

 
On 11/9/05, Stephan Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please please,

not again. Forward the request to elmo to open the breezy backports.

Actually I don't trust packages comeing from questionable sources.

So the source packages are a must.

Pitti could provide a package as well..but he is so keen and asks for a
backport.

Thx,

\sh

On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 13:58 -0500, John Dong wrote:
>
>
> On 11/9/05, Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>         On 11/9/05, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>         > It's understood that the sources are identical to Dapper
>         origins. Linking to
>         > the upstream source location should definitely be valid
>         GPL-wise.
>
>         He modified a gpl'ed program. So he has to provide the sources
>         to the
>         binary he builds. It is not sufficient to just point to the
>         'upstream
>         source location' where the work is based on.
>
> I don't see any evidence that any upstream file, other than the
> version field in debian/changelog, was modified during this backport.
>
>         I'm generally not that picky. The point here is that I have no
>         possibilty to verify that there was really not anything else
>         touched
>         than debian/changelog. Using the source package, I could
>         debdiff it
>         against the ubuntu package and build it myself. Publishing a
>         binary
>         package gains me nothing.
>
> Right, I understand the concern. You don't gain anything from this,
> but the rest of the backports users are getting really restless and
> upset about the lack of an official breezy-backports branch. As a
> result, some backports team members have been releasing their own
> binary packages in the meantime. They're not trying to push their work
> to archive.ubuntu.com -- that'll show up when the Breezy backports
> infrastructure comes up. Right now, they're just providing users some
> temporary appeasement while waiting for breezy-backports to appear.
>
>         --
>         regards,
>            Reinhard
>
>         --
>         ubuntu-backports mailing list
>         [email protected]
>         http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
>

--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Reply via email to