The only thing in Lunar's backports are the `cockpit` package, I forget
did we give that an exception?
Thomas
On 10/30/23 10:58, Thomas Ward wrote:
I'll take a look at Lunar (didn't that just release though...?) as I have a
server related task for that to work on.
Thomas
-----Original Message-----
From: ubuntu-backports <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
Dan Streetman
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 10:55 AM
To: Backports Discussion <[email protected]>
Subject: allowing backports into non-LTS releases
I'd like to propose changing our rules to allow - but not require - backports
into non-LTS releases. I think it makes sense to allow this, so the benefit of
backports can be provided in non-LTS releases as well.
As we currently do have backports in the non-LTS lunar and mantic queues, and
we've rescheduled our next meeting until the end of next month, if you have
time @teward and @mapreri I'd like to discuss over the ML, so we can accept (or
reject) the non-LTS uploads.
Thanks!
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
