On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 3:10 PM Thomas Ward <[email protected]> wrote: > > The only thing in Lunar's backports are the `cockpit` package, I forget > did we give that an exception?
well that's what I meant, should we continue with the 'exception only' policy for backports to non-LTS releases? Or should we allow optional backports to non-LTS releases? Personally I think it makes sense to allow backports to non-LTS releases without needing to get specific exception approval... > > > Thomas > > > On 10/30/23 10:58, Thomas Ward wrote: > > I'll take a look at Lunar (didn't that just release though...?) as I have a > > server related task for that to work on. > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ubuntu-backports <[email protected]> On > > Behalf Of Dan Streetman > > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 10:55 AM > > To: Backports Discussion <[email protected]> > > Subject: allowing backports into non-LTS releases > > > > I'd like to propose changing our rules to allow - but not require - > > backports into non-LTS releases. I think it makes sense to allow this, so > > the benefit of backports can be provided in non-LTS releases as well. > > > > As we currently do have backports in the non-LTS lunar and mantic queues, > > and we've rescheduled our next meeting until the end of next month, if you > > have time @teward and @mapreri I'd like to discuss over the ML, so we can > > accept (or reject) the non-LTS uploads. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > ubuntu-backports mailing list > > [email protected] > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports > > -- > ubuntu-backports mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
