I have doubts on the legality of that kind of strategie microsoft is trying to pull up

On 2011-09-23 22:32, wouter Vandenneucker wrote:
EPFSUG is already talking about shouting it out to some MEP's in order to make sure the rights of the users are guaranteed..
I guess this isn't the last we heard from it. (And that's a good thing!)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:16:48 +0200
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-be] Win8 will block dual-boot?

Microsoft does require that the hardware ships with UEFI secure boot enabled but it also states that it will support the unsecured boot process. If so then it's up to the hardware vendors to make it optional.

http://tweakers.net/nieuws/76961/microsoft-secure-boot-blokkeert-andere-besturingssystemen-niet.html
 (dutch)

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Pieter Vande Wyngaerde <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    UEFI secure booting (part 2)  via planet.debian.net
    <http://planet.debian.net>:

    very good good article @ http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/5850.html
    (Part 1 here: http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/5552.html)

    from the article:
    These are the facts:

    Windows 8 certification requires that hardware ship with UEFI secure
    boot enabled.
    Windows 8 certification does not require that the user be able to
    disable UEFI secure boot, and we've already been informed by hardware
    vendors that some hardware will not have this option.
    Windows 8 certification does not require that the system ship with any
    keys other than Microsoft's.
    A system that ships with UEFI secure boot enabled and only includes
    Microsoft's signing keys will only securely boot Microsoft operating
    systems.

    ...

    The truth is that Microsoft's move removes control from the end user
    and places it in the hands of Microsoft and the hardware vendors. The
    truth is that it makes it more difficult to run anything other than
    Windows. The truth is that UEFI secure boot is a valuable and
    worthwhile feature that Microsoft are misusing to gain tighter control
    over the market. And the truth is that Microsoft haven't even
    attempted to argue otherwise.



    On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Jurgen Gaeremyn
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    wrote:
    > Have a read here:
    >
    >
    
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/will-windows-8-block-users-from-dual-booting-linux-microsoft-wont-say/10772
    >
    > Grtz,
    > Jurgen.
    >
    > --
    > ubuntu-be mailing list / mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >
    > Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
    > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-be
    >

    --
    ubuntu-be mailing list / mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>

    Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
    https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-be



-- ubuntu-be mailing list / mailto:[email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-be

-- 
ubuntu-be mailing list / mailto:[email protected]

Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-be

Reply via email to