Brian Murray wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:06:42AM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:59:00AM +1000, Null Ack wrote: >> >>> Thanks very much guys :) >>> >>> Andreas, with your request for other examples here is a bug that I >>> have been triaging as part of my work on Intrepid: >>> >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/264571 >>> >>> Unlike some other examples, I didn't start this bug, cannot replicate >>> it and am actively triaging the issue with the bug reporter. >>> >>> Here's another one that I didn't start. I did not agree with a >>> previous comment about ignoring the EULA screen and I explained why >>> reasons for it. When Mark Shuttleworth came into the bug and asked for >>> suggestions about what could possibly be done, I responded with mine >>> which he seemed pleased with. It's at: >>> >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/269656 >>> >>> On the issue with not confirming your own bugs: >>> >>> * The documentation specifically states: >>> >>> When you have a complete report, and there is enough information to >>> debug the program, you can confirm the report. How do you know there >>> is enough information? Here are some example criteria, ANY of which is >>> sufficient: >>> >>> * Is there a patch that claims to fix the bug? >>> * Are there sufficient log files and crash dumps, as outlined in >>> DebuggingProcedures? >>> * Can you reproduce the bug yourself? >>> * Does another distribution have a complete and confirmed bug? >>> * Does the upstream author have a complete and confirmed bug? >>> >> Which documentation are you quoting here? >> > > I'm still curious about this as I'd like to update it. The quoted documentation is at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage#Confirming
Regards, Hew McLachlan
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
