On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 02:48:50PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 02:27:32PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > > On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 02:52:56PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > > I'd like to give Geir my strong +1 for membership in Bug Control. > > > He has shown an impressive level of dedication and patience in dealing > > > with the influx of -intel bugs that we see. > > > > > > Since we get so many bugs filed against X, a lot of the basic triage > > > work is automated. Geir has been instrumental at the more advanced > > > level that really requires human intervention, patiently helping > > > frustrated bug reporters through tricky situations to gather the > > > necessary information, and in numerous cases helping guide the bug > > > towards a solution. He has also taken an active role in establishing a > > > team-wide standardization of tags for X bugs to facilitate finding dupes > > > (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Tagging). > > > > Would it be useful to have these be incorporated in the lp_buttontags > > greasemonkey script? > > Sure, although personally I use launchpadlib scripts for setting tags > these days. Probably it would make sense to port lp_buttontags to use > launchpadlib.
I think I'm missing something here how would porting it to launchpadlib help? I think the advantage of the greasemonkey scripts is that it presents everything right there in your web browser and acts as a reminder of the commonly used tags to without having to load a wiki page. I think there is value in using launchpadlib for complex operations but not for just adding tags. -- Brian Murray @ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
