Hi, this is me again. I have not heard about my application so thought I should ask my self. Is there any further information required or anything else
Regards On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Brian Curtis <[email protected]> wrote: > He's been a huge help with empathy bug triage already. Def +1 > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:55 PM, omer akram <[email protected]> wrote: > > sorry for the late reply, I had a paper. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/499529 > > gnome guys declined it but if they would have accepted it then wishlist > > would be the best status because this is not a bug rather a minor request > > about a feature that does not exist in empathy. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/504193 > > In this case an implemented feature in the app is causing a minor > usability > > issue so marking it of low priority would be wise. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/431073 > > again of low importance because it creates a bit of annoyance as I myself > > face it sometimes. Enter key is far from hand so it don't cause trouble > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/empathy/+bug/495385 > > On this one i might be asked this is also a new feature that does not > exist > > in empathy then why mark it of low priority. I myself would have first > > thought it a wishlist but it is also a feature that people have been used > to > > in pidgin/xchat before karmic. there was another bug called 'basic irc > > command don't work in empathy' and that was marked wishlist but this > > specific bug should be marked low because the other bug claimed to be > fixed > > but /part still did not work so it was not fully fixed and was an > ancestor > > of the main bug. > > @scott after what you said about stock responses I used them where they > were > > required > > It would be a real pleasure to beome a member of Ubuntu Bug Control. > > Thanks! > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Scott Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Thanks Micah! > >> > >> > Coredump should be deleted only after retrace is attempted/completed. > >> > Bugs > >> > should remain private until that occurs. Someone else can probably > >> > expand > >> > on this. > >> > >> >This is assuming that the retracer is subscribed. If a user attaches a > >> > coredump without the retracer, Scott is correct. > >> > >> Micah is correct. I usually don't even work on crash bugs before the > >> retrace has occurred. Once the retrace has occurred, LP should > >> automatically delete the coredump. At that point you can triage, > >> sanitize any traces, and make it public. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol > > Post to : [email protected] > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > > > -- > Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing. > --Wernher Von Braun > "The second law of thermodynamics: If you think things are in a mess > now, JUST WAIT!!" > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > The Statement Below is True > The Statement Above is False > ---------------------------------------------------------------- >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
