trimmed a bit > 1) Receipts are not there to notify when users open mail but that > they have (or at least could) read it > 2) If allowing or disallowing the receipt is not done systematically, > but on user request, what else could it OBVIOUSLY depend on than ON > THE CONTENTS, contrary to what you say? > 3) Have you ever compared with other MUAs?
I agree with these points. > 4) How can an OBVIOUS bug be incomplete? > 5) Ubuntu requests its users to report bugs to Ubuntu and nothing > else. Please be organized to have that information circulating where > it should to get the problem solved and, most importantly, so that > programmers can ask reporters about more details they need. > 6) Improving Ubuntu is not eliminating bugs from the database after > 60 days but correcting them. (while i agree) not relevant to moving this bug forward. > 7) Alexander Sack, you should THINK before repeatedly destroying the > work that volunteers have done after a deep analysis of the problem. > > This is too much. If this bug is not returned to the status Hilario > J. Montoliu set it, I will definitely stop cooperating with Ubuntu > and I will report why. > I have respect for volunteering, so I wish reporters' and triagers' > work wasn't destroyed. This is just a rant, and not helpful in making someone else *want* to fix a bug. Please save such rants for your website :) (or your launchpad page, if you feel so inclined). kk > -- Return Receipt's prompt before allowing the mail to be read. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
