Hi,
hm... the patch isn't invasive, but idjc (binary) has never been published to
edgy or prior.
Imo -backports would be a preferable target then.
However you could also argue, that it fixes a broken source package, which
would at least to some extent qualify -updates. OTOH the source isn't really
broken by itself, just the dependencies reside in the wrong section.
Not quite sure about this one, but I have a slight preference for
-backports. Other opinions?
Cheers,
Stefan.
--
[DEBDIFF] Dependency problem
https://launchpad.net/bugs/66475
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
