> However, it says "second X server pretends to be DRI capable", which mesa is clearly not.
Err... maybe I'm confused but I am not seeing that the X server is pretending to be DRI capable. From the guest Xorg.0.log it clearly says that DRI is disabled: (EE) intel(0): [dri] DRIScreenInit failed. Disabling DRI. ... (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI capable ... -- white screen on second session with compiz: pretends to have a second DRI capable head where it doesn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269509 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
