>@ktp420: notify-osd is the result of different design decisions. >We understand and acknowledge that this may not match the > work habits of all of our users, and that's why the straciatella session > mechanism exists.
I can't understand that cource of argumenation. It might be a design decision to not overload a gui with too many configuration details, but this certainly isn't applicable on configuration files. What was this design decision about? Not to overload the file system or gconf? I'm sorry, but if you refuse to implement even the most basic configuration options in your application, that is not a design decision, that's failure. I'm perfectly fine with waiting for the next version of your software, as I can understand that people are doing this for free and need more time. But if you actually think it's just fine the way it is, let me tell you, that your work is worth barely more than nothing for most of us and that it should not be the default in a distribution like Ubuntu. -- notify-osd doesn't honor my preference https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346095 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
