On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 20:01, Loïc Minier<[email protected]> wrote: > The packaging of ibus-anthy is really substandard; I'm willing to help > improve it, but couldn't locate the definitive base on which to start > this work: karmic has a source which points at lp:~lidaobing/+junk/ibus- > anthy but this branch doesn't contain the karmic version nor the jaunty > one (but does contain another jaunty version).
it contains the debian version[1]. [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ibus-anthy.html > > Things I've noticed: > - removal of patch system with removal of last patch (increases delta with > Debian needlessly in this case too, even if it's the same maintainer) which patch is needed? > - useless CROSS vars / logic in rules (uses dh_autoconfigure); also useless > tests for presence of config.guess/.sub from autotools-dev > - references unknown clean0 target in rules' .PHONY > - lintian override to hide an actual error (ibus-anthy: > binary-without-manpage) > - no Python-Version/pyversions but calls dh_pysupport; package isn't named > python-foo, didn't check actual contents > - doesn't call intltool-update on build please provide a patch, thanks. > - no watch file there is a watch file[2]. [2] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~lidaobing/%2Bjunk/ibus-anthy/annotate/head%3A/debian/watch -- Best Regards LI Daobing -- [MIR] ibus and data packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
