On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 14:06, Loïc Minier<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009, LI Daobing wrote: >> > I'm saying here that's it's a bad idea to strip the patch system with >> > the last patch; it's best to keep it around. Especially when we have >> > patches in Ubuntu and none in Debian or vice-versa, removing the patch >> > system itself is an useless diff. >> I think if there is no patch, then no patch system is needed. > > As I said, this creates useless delta when the only change in one > distro is to add or remove a patch. Instead of seeing that only > change, you see the addition/removal of the patch system itself. > > It's also not terribly nice to have to add a patch system when you > realize you need to do a stable update or security upload. > > Anyway since you maintain the packages in both Debian and Ubuntu, I > expect you'll deal with that anyway. :-) > >> >> please provide a patch, thanks. >> > Yes, I'm willing to do that, but against what? >> I prefer the lastest version: http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ibus- >> anthy.html > > Hmm ok, so not against the bzr branch you mentionned? > based on the bzr branch is better.
-- Best Regards LI Daobing -- [MIR] ibus and data packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
