On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 12:01:40PM IST, Oli wrote: > It *was* my belief that the lib32 libs are just repackaged builds of the > 32bit libs. It sounds like that is not the case but considering it works, > why not do just that?
The plan is to get rid of this big piece of monolithic baggage that is ia32-libs. It will take a while, but if moving pulse to having lib32 packages helps with that process, then its well worth it. Long term, there are much better plans for multi-architecture support, but these are probably a release or two away at least. Luke -- libasound_module_conf_pulse.so is missing from lib32asound-plugins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
