Lol! While I appreciate the vote of confidence, the goal was NEVER to have a dictatorship, benevolent or otherwise!
I think what Scott says about some form of formalizing governance is actually very correct. However, the meta package (any meta-package instance) has a "snapshot" instance of the seed; it does not pull or re- germinate it when it builds. Hence, as long as it is safe at the time of submission, a given update of the package will be safe, well, at least for the current one. Also, we could setup a separate release subteam that is not open commit, and have it moved to there. I think we should hold a quick IRC meeting in any case to ratify some basic governance... -- [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
