I also noticed the same problem with Dates and reported a bug in the Opened Hand bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=128 Following on from that bug report, the Dates developer has closed the bug as invalid because he believes that Evo is correctly applying the recurrence rule. In other words, the recurrence rule: appointment recurs every 1 week on mon, tue, wed, thur, fri for 4 occurrences means: appointment recurs every 1 week on mon, tue, wed, thur, fri for 4 days and not: appointment recurs every 1 week on mon, tue, wed, thur, fri for 4 weeks When I created the rule, I assumed that it meant the latter and this seems to be what Evo uses to publish the calendar. If this is not the case, then either Evo is generating an incorrect ical file and this bug needs to be retitled, or icalx.com is misinterpreting the ical file and the bug needs to be closed. Here is the VEVENT from the ics file Evo published on icalx.com: BEGIN:VEVENT UID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DTSTAMP:20060721T115018Z DTSTART;TZID=/softwarestudio.org/Olson_20011030_5/Europe/London: 20060724T100000 DTEND;TZID=/softwarestudio.org/Olson_20011030_5/Europe/London: 20060724T170000 TRANSP:OPAQUE SEQUENCE:4 SUMMARY:Build Day CLASS:PRIVATE CREATED:20060721T115144 LAST-MODIFIED:20060721T115451 RRULE;X-EVOLUTION-ENDDATE=20060727T090000Z:FREQ=WEEKLY;COUNT=4;INTERVAL=1; BYDAY=MO,TU,WE,TH,FR END:VEVENT In any event there is certainly room for improvement in the recurrence rule dialogue, it's very ambiguous. Will check the GNOME bugzilla and create a bug report if needed. -- recurring events not displayed correctly https://launchpad.net/bugs/53684 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
