What version of virtualbox are you using? I'm curious now, I have version
3.1.0 for reference. Also, what do you mean by stuttering/pausing? Is there
a reference for these kernel bugs?

Just curious...want to know what to expect if this starts happening / how to
tell. Thanks.

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Zatara214 <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm fairly certain that the vbox issues I'm having are also an effect of
> the new kernel.  Never had these issues with 2.6.28.  I'll probably
> switch back if the generic kernel doesn't turn out to be anything good.
> Apparently there was a new bug introduced in 2.6.31 that required the
> real-time kernel to be installed or vbox wouldn't work as it should
> (which I experienced before, but I was hoping it was fixed).  I'm
> surprised you haven't had this issue, as well.  Guest pausing/stuttering
> every 15 or so seconds.
>
> --
> ac adapter is not detected
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412499
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Triaged
>
> Bug description:
> The latest version of jaunty generates errors when trying to load the acpi
> ac adapter state on boot. The resultant behavior is that the system is
> unaware of the ac adapter state (nothing gets populated in
> /proc/acpi/ac_adapter or its equivalent sys directory). The error can be
> seen via 'dmesg | grep ACPI' after booting:
>
> [    1.679140] ACPI Error (psargs-0358): [\_PR_.CPU0._PSS] Namespace lookup
> fail
> ure, AE_NOT_FOUND
> [    1.679167] ACPI Error (psparse-0524): Method parse/execution failed
> [\_SB_.A
> C__.ADJP] (Node ffff88013f81a660), AE_NOT_FOUND
> [    1.679215] ACPI Error (psparse-0524): Method parse/execution failed
> [\_SB_.A
> C__._PSR] (Node ffff88013f81a620), AE_NOT_FOUND
> [    1.679264] ACPI Exception (ac-0135): AE_NOT_FOUND, Error reading AC
> Adapter state [20080926]
> [    1.769339] ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT0] (battery present)
>
> This is most problematic on the kubuntu distribution, as it relies on this
> information to determine the ac adapter state for powerdevil. On gnome there
> is some sort of fall back and the correct state is determined (possibly by
> interpreting /proc/acpi/battery/*)?  After investigating this further, I
> recompiled the stock ubuntu kernel from source with acpi_ac as a module
> instead of into the kernel and the ac adapter state is detected correctly.
> ACPI no longer generates errors and outputs the following:
>
> [    1.824127] ACPI: CPU1 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2] C3[C3])
> [    1.824141] processor ACPI_CPU:01: registered as cooling_device1
> [    1.824143] ACPI: Processor [CPU1] (supports 8 throttling states)
> [    1.858123] ACPI: Thermal Zone [TZ0] (57 C)
> [   12.273114] ACPI: Video Device [PEGP] (multi-head: yes  rom: no  post:
> no)
> [   12.302021] ACPI: AC Adapter [AC] (on-line)
>
> Is this the correct method to solve this problem? I've checked this
> solution against several other distributions that report the ac adapter
> state correctly (namely ArchLinux and openSUSE) and from what I can tell
> this is the solution that is used in each case.
>
> lsb_release -rd
> --
> Description:    Ubuntu 9.04
> Release:        9.04
>
> uname -a
> --
> Linux kronos 2.6.28-14-generic #47 SMP Wed Aug 12 07:37:17 EDT 2009 x86_64
> GNU/Linux
>
> apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.28-14-generic
> --
> linux-image-2.6.28-14-generic:
>  Installed: 2.6.28-14.47
>  Candidate: 2.6.28-14.47
>  Version table:
>     2.6.28-14.47 0
>        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main Packages
>        500 http://security.ubuntu.com jaunty-security/main Packages
>  *** 2.6.28-14.47 0
>        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/412499/+subscribe
>

-- 
ac adapter is not detected
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to