On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 00:36 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 03:23:12PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: > > I am a bit uncertain about this patch in stable from the view of regression > > avoidance. Looking over the patch its hard to tell for certain whether the > > path > > of execution is the same as before for the non-interleaved protocol. > > Dmitry, how do you feel about it? Or maybe there has even be positive > > testing > > with non-interleaved hardware with that patch. > > Umm, it is a bit large for -stable to my taste. However without the > patch the affected laptops are pretty much unusable so I think we better > get it in. The non-interleaved devices should continue to work fine, at > least I don't see any adverse effects on my d630 (caveat - I am not > using _this_ version of the patch but rather what is currently in Linus's > tree). [...]
For what it's worth, we already added this to Debian kernel packages and I don't believe we've seen any bug reports related to it. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo. -- ALPS DualPoint Touchpad flaky performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296610 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
