Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 00:36 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 03:23:12PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: >>> I am a bit uncertain about this patch in stable from the view of regression >>> avoidance. Looking over the patch its hard to tell for certain whether the >>> path >>> of execution is the same as before for the non-interleaved protocol. >>> Dmitry, how do you feel about it? Or maybe there has even be positive >>> testing >>> with non-interleaved hardware with that patch. >> Umm, it is a bit large for -stable to my taste. However without the >> patch the affected laptops are pretty much unusable so I think we better >> get it in. The non-interleaved devices should continue to work fine, at >> least I don't see any adverse effects on my d630 (caveat - I am not >> using _this_ version of the patch but rather what is currently in Linus's >> tree). > [...] > > For what it's worth, we already added this to Debian kernel packages and > I don't believe we've seen any bug reports related to it. > > Ben. > That sounds good. Thanks for that feedback Ben. For the Ubuntu part, I dicussed this with Andy and we agreed to take it into Lucid first and then roll it back to Karmic after a little delay.
-Stefan -- ALPS DualPoint Touchpad flaky performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296610 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
