I have a different opinion. You compared the sugar extensions to the Firefox extensions. You can easily install Firefox extensions as user, but we provide many extensions through the archive. Having the extensions in the archive gives us some advantages: * The extension is free (libre) software and we trust the source. * You can install them system wide. * The extension works with the Firefox version that we have in the archive.
As long the extension in the archive works with the sugar version in the archive, we should keep them. -- Please remove package from Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512607 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
