+1 keeping the activities updated will give me some much need experience. The next question is:
Several of these older activity packages were packaged several years ago by one packager using a specific method. Moving forward, we will be working with the current upstream dd. He has a different style. Are there any challenges we should be aware of when syncing packages of the same name which are actually quite different? On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Benjamin Drung <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a different opinion. You compared the sugar extensions to the Firefox > extensions. You can easily install Firefox extensions as user, but we provide > many extensions through the archive. Having the extensions in the archive > gives us some advantages: > * The extension is free (libre) software and we trust the source. > * You can install them system wide. > * The extension works with the Firefox version that we have in the archive. > > As long the extension in the archive works with the sugar version in the > archive, we should keep them. > > -- > Please remove package from Lucid > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512607 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Please remove package from Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512607 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
