Many thanks for the thoughtful comment, Chow Loong Jin. Although I disagree with the idea, I am happy to hear that at least some thought has been given to it. I will consider discussing the matter on the mailing list, but just for the sake of completeness, I will write a short reply here as well.
What you call counter-intuitive I consider intuitive and vice versa, so that is of course something to discuss; I do accept that we are not talking about a straightforward bug here and that the invalid status is therefore correct. By the way, I noticed that Apple in their iTunes have decided on a third option: stop playing tracks altogether if the user has changed the track view. I did not realize this before, and it has made me reconsider some aspects of my opinion. Generally, although not always, Apple gets these things right. I guess I would be happy with the way Banshee works if it was possible to program at least the play queue just to keep on advancing while I browsed the other tracks. (This is what iTunes does as well.) But it seems that the play queue has several other bugs, one of which I have already reported and another one that I just noticed and will report as soon as I understand it. The reason I stopped using the play queue was because it behaved in an unpredictable way, and I have not even been able to understand even how it should work, not to mention how it actually does work. I will take the matter to other forums (and other bug reports) so that I may find at least one way to use Banshee without problems. -- Banshee selects next track according to current view https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
