I don't mind discussing thing, but it seems pretty pointless. Actually, on the two machines that I normally run under Ubuntu, I also am forced to use older versions of Ubuntu because the newer versions are NOT reliable enough. I am running the newest version experimentally on three machines--but I can't rely on it. This is NOT progress.
For what little it is worth, I think the fundamental problem with Ubuntu is that the economic model they are using is broken. It worked to a certain point, but at this point the regression testing is clearly inadequate. As a constructive suggestion, here is a link to a funding model that might provide a better balance between new features and keeping things working: http://eco-epistemology.blogspot.com/2009/11/economics-of-small-donors- reverse.html -- [MASTER] various unrelated crashes for firefox-3.0 and xulrunner-1.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
