I do not know much about version numbering, but since I was curious and looked some stuff up here is what I found:
There are two ways to number svn releases that seem to be equivalent: e.g.: navit_0.1.1+svn1234 navit_0.2.0~svn1234 (the tilde means less than; a package 0.2.0 would supersede it;) The latouche archive uses 0.1.0+svn version numbers while 0.1.1 has been released. The program internally speaks of itself as 0.2.0 (both the navit -v commandline and the about page in the GUI). debian uses the 0.2.0~ numbering, too: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=navit&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all I also suspect that reducing the version number is maybe not practical. Up might be the much preferred direction. I suspect that it would be much easier to ask the maintainer of the latouche archive whether he would consider changing to the debian/ubuntu numbering. Just my two cents. Regards, Wolfgang -- wrong version of navit in the repositories ( 0.1 instead of 0.2 ) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590424 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
