Well I ran three more tests, albeit quitting the installs to expedite
testing, and the first looked promising, the second less so, but the
third scares me real bad.

Test #1 began with this:

la...@lance-desktop:~$ sudo parted /dev/sdb print
[sudo] password for lance: 
Model: ATA WDC WD800JB-00JJ (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 80.0GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos

Number  Start   End     Size    Type      File system     Flags
 1      32.3kB  1119MB  1119MB  primary   ntfs
 2      1119MB  53.7GB  52.6GB  primary   ntfs
 3      53.7GB  59.0GB  5322MB  primary   ntfs
 4      59.0GB  80.0GB  21.0GB  extended
 5      59.0GB  77.8GB  18.8GB  logical   ext4
 6      77.8GB  80.0GB  2270MB  logical   linux-swap(v1)

The result was good, it offered to resize sdb5 and leave all three NTFS
partitions alone.

Test #2 began just by deleting sdb4, 5 & 6:

Number  Start   End     Size    Type     File system  Flags
 1      32.3kB  1119MB  1119MB  primary  ntfs
 2      1119MB  53.7GB  52.6GB  primary  ntfs
 3      53.7GB  59.0GB  5322MB  primary  ntfs

But I left the free space unallocated and was offered to resize sdb2.
Not great but at least it shouldn't result in data loss regardless of
the outcome. It would however be nice to have the option of using the
free space :^)

For test #3 I created four NTFS partitions. That's not uncommon with new
"branded" Win 7 computers, you'll quite often see one tiny partition
with part of the Win boot files, the main OS partition, another with
"recovery", and a fourth with some silly "system utilities".

Anyway running a test with 4 NTFS partitions resulted in "The entire
disc will be used" and of course you also see the offer to go advanced
but I can guarantee you that people don't read! They think, "I told it
to install side-by-side so that's what it should do"! And also realize
that most Windows users are used to Drive A, Drive C, etc. so when they
see I'm going to "use the whole disc" they're NOT thinking what you and
I think.

I'm reminded of what Ivanka Majic said here:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/628087/comments/31

"The installation experience should be attractive and effortless to
reassure new users that Ubuntu is the right choice. The process should
feel safe and should only highlight risk when necessary (e.g. when data
will be destroyed)."

We are NOT highlighting that risk!

I can only imagine the forums being flooded with complaints of lost OS's
and data. Not a good thing!

Sadly I have no idea how to deal with this.

-- 
Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655950
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to