I don't think one has to increase the visibility anymore for that one by 
getting more people to click "This bug affects me." And it is surely more than 
181 people. 
The reason is that we deal here with a more basic concept of proxy servers and 
not that some specialized function of a program like: "When I open a *.png file 
with an underscore in its name the program crashes" or other funny stuff. 

Normal everyday users that don't really care about the way software is 
developed (reporting bugs etc) will surely not get a Launchpad account just to 
report that Ubuntu One doesn't work for them at their work place. 
And as I understood it, the goal of Ubuntu is accessibility and having an 
all-in-one package for the (non-geeky) masses. These people will come to the 
conclusion that Ubuntu and maybe even Linux in general is buggy and working 
only half of the time (which is feeding anti-FOSS arguments). 
These people will expect that when they have a global proxy setting and the 
application itself does not have a way to change its behavior and it doesn't 
work... the conclusion is: "It is a broken piece of software". And they are 
right to do so... actually that is my conclusion too...
After 2 years it is beyond being a "missing feature"... I'd say it is a 
bug/broken/neglectance... or how you want to call it...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387308

Title:
  HTTPS Proxy Support for file sync

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to