On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote: > I don't think we want another libjpeg to support.
Why not? This can be useful for ARM devices as it can be accelerated with NEON support, and it's the same code already integrated at chromium and firefox (but as internal libraries). Don't see why having at universe would not be desirable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/849337 Title: FFe: include libjpeg-turbo, a derivative of libjpeg that uses SIMD instructions and additional optimizations To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libjpeg-turbo/+bug/849337/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
