Alex, we all agree that he makes some valid points - but it's not like
people don't realise these problems exist and are ignoring them.
Certainly from my point of view Oneiric was better quality than Natty
(though this was largely down to less churn rather than better quality
processes).
Hadmut,
It would be more useful to raise a specific bug about the commercial
software (you haven't mentioned which software it is) and if you have
concerns about the quality processes then try addressing the ubuntu-qa
mailing list for example.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886931
Title:
Oneiric is a regression due to dysfunctional quality assurance
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886931/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
