On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 16:14, Dave Stroud <[email protected]> wrote: > Every one has diferent taste so if you dont like one try another, they are > free and support is free.
Serve different tastes is one of the biggest advantages of Linux. And BTW you can have paid support too. > On the other hand most of the problems in linux is caused because > vendors dont cooperate with their drivers, and linux and open source has to > come up with a way to work around it.They are doing a good job of it in > most cases. I stick with vendors where I know that they use compatible hardware when building their laptops. > I dont like unity either so I stick with gnome. I think, Unity got much better in the last months regarding stability and with a little changing of my habits I like it besides one big problem left: I have many programs I need very often and I have usually many programs open. The launcher on the left (even with smallest possible icons) gets annoying when you then often need to scroll down. Sub-Launchers (or submenus in the launcher - however you call it) would help me but ASFAIK currently not supported. Hope they will add something like that. On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 15:27, vekotin <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that by dividing into masses of distros and not working more > together, caused that very own problem of linux. Too many working on the same thing can even decrease productivity, outcome and speed. Not sure if it would help if all would work just on one single UI style. I either think that the diversity increases creativity of all. > linux- and open source -communities shoult take a look at themselves > with a mirror, and stop blaming others of problems of their very own. > That would be the only solution and way to better success, to make > better linux-products. Again, diversity I don't see as a problem. Vendors not providing drivers for Linux or ignorant software vendors still focusing on Windows only is reason to blame. I know people who would prefer Linux if the specific stuff they need would be available on Linux too. Don't blame the Linux community! Blame the software vendors who still live in 15 years ago, where 99,9 % on the client was Windows. Although everybody still speaks of the 1-5 % - I don't believe this any more as I encounter more and more people using Linux. > I have seen during last years, how same problems exists again and again > with ubuntu releases. It is shameles to see them exist that way. I have > laptop that is among the most sold laptops in the world and every ubuntu > release has problems with it No matter how many times it is sold - the tipping point is: What components are built in there? Probably those are not good for Linux. > mostly same problems again and again. Then > those problems are solved within some months after release, but still, > that Windows-world does that much much better. On my laptop - using since Jaunty, I never had important issues with Ubuntu. One thing you are right: There are some bugs that - although already fixed - sometimes come back and then get fixed again. > And moreover, some things work in Fedora and openSUSE - and not in > ubuntu, so how on earth open source can't make that open source thing > work in reality? My experience: More things work in Ubuntu and don't work in Fedora (openSUSE I do not use). > So, market share of Windows isn't the problems. Problems is the lack of > real as good alternatives, made by really good co-work. My experience: Where the good alternatives are missing is for that software that is made by external vendors not well integrated in the rest of the Linux and open source world. > And ubuntu's Unity has been a huge mess - much bigger mess than Vista > ever did. I have a different view on that. 80 % of the standard-users would be perfectly fine with it. > I have always wondered, how free hobby work can aim to be professional. > Within these ubuntu years I have seen, that hobby work really can't be > so professional. Still widespread myth. Linux world is not just students coding in their spare time - indeed most of the work is done by paid employees. - Have a look at recent statistics - like http://apcmag.com/linux-now-75-corporate.htm And apart from that I have a lot of experience with commercial software on Windows too and I can tell you: The quality is very poor there! By tendency more features than in open source but they are very buggy. Tendency for the Ubuntu apps is: Less features but they simply work (of course there are bugs there also). Best regards, Martin. -- Martin Wildam http://martin.wildam.org/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 Title: Microsoft has a majority market share To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/clubdistro/+bug/1/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
