Hi Andreia,

I think that your error is unrelated to this bug.
The bug is related to a control variable for hugetlbfs, confusingly named 
"quota". This variable has nothing to do with quota in NFS servers.

Good luck,
--Shachar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Andreia Pio da Silva
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:26 PM
> To: Shachar Raindel
> Subject: [Bug 990368] Re: CVE-2012-2133
> 
> hugepages: fix use after free bug in "quota" handling - LP: #990368 -
> CVE-2012-2133
> 
> Hi,
> 
> My NFS server is a ubuntu server 10.04.
> 
> please, after the kernel update to version 2.6.32.41 I am with the
> following problem: I had the problem in NFS clients in the creation or
> editing of files for only a few accounts:
> 
> fsync failed: Disk quota exceeded
> 
> Is very strange happens only on some accounts.
> 
> I emphasize that these accounts with this error message has sufficient
> quota on the server.
> 
> Today I updated kernel to version 2.6.32.41.90 but the error remains.
> 
> Have disabled the control of quotas on the server but can not take this as
> a solution. Any proposal that can solve this problem?
> 
> Thanks,
> Andreia Pio da Silva
> 
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (987107).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990368
> 
> Title:
>   CVE-2012-2133
> 
> Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-armadaxp” package in Ubuntu:
>   Fix Committed
> Status in “linux-ec2” package in Ubuntu:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-fsl-imx51” package in Ubuntu:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-maverick” package in Ubuntu:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-natty” package in Ubuntu:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-oneiric” package in Ubuntu:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-mvl-dove” package in Ubuntu:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-ti-omap4” package in Ubuntu:
>   Fix Committed
> Status in “linux” source package in Lucid:
>   Fix Released
> Status in “linux-armadaxp” source package in Lucid:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-ec2” source package in Lucid:
>   Fix Released
> Status in “linux-fsl-imx51” source package in Lucid:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-maverick” source package in Lucid:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-natty” source package in Lucid:
>   Fix Released
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-oneiric” source package in Lucid:
>   Fix Released
> Status in “linux-mvl-dove” source package in Lucid:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-ti-omap4” source package in Lucid:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux” source package in Natty:
>   Fix Released
> Status in “linux-armadaxp” source package in Natty:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-ec2” source package in Natty:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-fsl-imx51” source package in Natty:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-maverick” source package in Natty:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-natty” source package in Natty:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-oneiric” source package in Natty:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-mvl-dove” source package in Natty:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-ti-omap4” source package in Natty:
>   Confirmed
> Status in “linux” source package in Oneiric:
>   Fix Released
> Status in “linux-armadaxp” source package in Oneiric:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-ec2” source package in Oneiric:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-fsl-imx51” source package in Oneiric:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-maverick” source package in Oneiric:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-natty” source package in Oneiric:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-oneiric” source package in Oneiric:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-mvl-dove” source package in Oneiric:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-ti-omap4” source package in Oneiric:
>   Fix Released
> Status in “linux” source package in Precise:
>   Fix Released
> Status in “linux-armadaxp” source package in Precise:
>   Fix Committed
> Status in “linux-ec2” source package in Precise:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-fsl-imx51” source package in Precise:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-maverick” source package in Precise:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-natty” source package in Precise:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-oneiric” source package in Precise:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-mvl-dove” source package in Precise:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-ti-omap4” source package in Precise:
>   Fix Released
> Status in “linux” source package in Quantal:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-armadaxp” source package in Quantal:
>   Fix Committed
> Status in “linux-ec2” source package in Quantal:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-fsl-imx51” source package in Quantal:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-maverick” source package in Quantal:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-natty” source package in Quantal:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-oneiric” source package in Quantal:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-mvl-dove” source package in Quantal:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-ti-omap4” source package in Quantal:
>   Fix Committed
> Status in “linux” source package in Hardy:
>   Confirmed
> Status in “linux-armadaxp” source package in Hardy:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-ec2” source package in Hardy:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-fsl-imx51” source package in Hardy:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-maverick” source package in Hardy:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-natty” source package in Hardy:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-lts-backport-oneiric” source package in Hardy:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-mvl-dove” source package in Hardy:
>   Invalid
> Status in “linux-ti-omap4” source package in Hardy:
>   Invalid
> 
> Bug description:
>   There is a use after free bug in the kernel hugetlb code. The bug can
>   allow an authenticated, unprivileged local attacker to crash the
>   system (and possibly gain higher privileges) if huge pages are enabled
>   in the system.
> 
>   Break-Fix: - 90481622d75715bfcb68501280a917dbfe516029
> 
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/990368/+subscripti
> ons

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990368

Title:
  CVE-2012-2133

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/990368/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to