On Feb 08, 2013, at 12:25 PM, Alex Clark wrote: >Is fixing the broken imports an option?
Probably only with enough volunteers to fix upstream and/or provide patches to the Debian and/or Ubuntu packages. It's always better to fix things as far upstream as possible of course. >If not, then yeah restoring PIL's PIL.pth is probably the best approach. We >can't do this in Pillow, but it probably makes sense for Ubuntu to do it as a >patch until such time as the imports can be fixed. We can't restore PIL.pth because of the relative imports in Pillow, but my branch (see merge proposal) does add a new compatibility binary package. We'd still have to patch the Ubuntu/Debian packages to Depend on the compat package, but that's not too much work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1112496 Title: python-imaging broken in raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/1112496/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
