I fail to see how the option to allow the user to select a subvolume name other than @ for root and @home for /home would apply in the above linked instance.
Unless I am reading that information incorrectly, as long as the corresponding subvolumes described in the mount options for / and /home reside immediately below the default mounting subvolume (level 5) there should be no difference. I have no problems booting to any BTRFS subvolume name I use. I'm only asking to have control over the NAME of the installation subvolumes, not to change the level in the btrfs tree. It seems this is a Ubiquity induced problem, not a btrfs limitation. Thanks anyway. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1131852 Title: WISH: Allow more control of BTRFS install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1131852/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
