** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Incomplete
** Information type changed from Private to Public
** Description changed:
- *** Private as long as still processing FFE and filling in the template
- ***
+ *** Still processing FFE and filling in the template ***
[Availability]
The source code is available from: git://dpdk.org/dpdk
General information: http://dpdk.org
[Rationale]
The DPDK library will be a build dependency for openvswitch package (extra
variant using DPDK instead of kernel network stack). Potentially there will be
more projects doing the same, so this should be part of the endorsed set of
packages.
[Security]
[Quality assurance]
[Dependencies]
texlive-fonts-extra is in universe (!)
[Standards compliance]
[Maintenance]
- [Background information]
+ [Background information]
Of the produced binary packages only libdpdk0 and libdpdk-dev would be
required to be in main. The texlive-fonts-extra build dependency only is
required to process the dpkd-doc binary(-indep) package.
Can we only put the source and both library package into main and by
that avoid the dependency issue?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1492186
Title:
[MIR] dpdk
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1492186/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
