> I agree that we cannot move juju 1.25.1 out of proposed until the issue is > resolved. > Discussions between dimitern and mpontillo indicate that this is a maas > 1.9beta2+ > regression which changes in juju 1.25.1 exposed.
It also exposed a bug in juju-core (it ignores the fact that the claim- sticky-ip-address call actually failed): https://bugs.launchpad.net /juju-core/+bug/1520199 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1519527 Title: juju 1.25.1: lxc units all have the same IP address - changed to claim_sticky_ip_address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1519527/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
