Sadly, being stuck in -proposed is probably correct for beta3, due to
the above mentioned lxd breakages.

Note that the future-lxd-provider gets futher, but still breaks due to
changes in lxd since the test was last modified with beta2:

+ lxd-images import ubuntu yenial --alias ubuntu-yenial
debian/tests/lxd-provider: line 8: lxd-images: command not found

Also, we don't have coverage for lxd on armhf or s390x as they can't
provide machine-level isolation. That's probably fine, but can maybe be
improved when we have more confidence lxd/juju won't blow things up as
much as the dev versions have tended to.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545913

Title:
  [FFe] juju-core 2.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/+bug/1545913/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to