Out of curiosity, how many changes per second were you doing?

On 16 Nov 2016 23:20, "Colin Ian King" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Well, until it's fixed, does that mean that unsuccessful transactions
> will cause snapd to eat memory - and if so, that seems like a DoS vector
> to me.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Snappy
> Developers, which is subscribed to snapd in Ubuntu.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642068
>
> Title:
>   snapd memory sizes grows huge over time
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/
> 1642068/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642068

Title:
  snapd memory sizes grows huge over time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1642068/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to