@Colin, Sure it definitely needs to be improved. As I said above, this is just a cheap way to get us going, and the proper fix is a transactional storage on disk.
@Mark, Yes, we can prune based on number of changes as well. It's not expensive. That's a good trick to get us going farther. @John, 2MB / (10 tasks * 180 changes) is in the ballpark of 1kb per task. That's not unrealistic I think. Also worth noting it's not just plain data.. there will be a small amount of additional garbage created per entry when processing it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642068 Title: snapd memory sizes grows huge over time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1642068/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
