This introduces a python dependency to base-files, which I think is incorrect. I think the decision to choose base-files should be reevaluated.
>From the point of view of end-users, regardless if the script is in base-files or in its own package, the same number of apt commands will be needed either way. It's either: apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade ubuntu-advantage enable-esm <token> or: apt-get update apt-get install ubuntu-advantage ubuntu-advantage enable-esm <token> In its own package it can have its own copyright, manpage, correct dependencies, its own source tarball, tests (which were stripped from the debdiff here), upstream url, nice description, etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1686183 Title: Ship ubuntu-advantage in basefiles for ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/1686183/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
