We certainly should be doing a better job at detecting existing btrfs and having "lxd init" default to something sane in that case.
For the record I believe the expected flow is: 1) Create new storage pool => yes 2) Name of storage backend => btrfs 3) Create new BTRFS pool => yes 4) Would you like to use an existing block => no 5) Would you like to create a new subvolume => yes Now I think it'd make sense for 5 to be moved to 3 as that's what most people will want in such cases. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1717771 Title: confusing btrfs storage pool creation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/1717771/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
