Have you fixed (a)? Have you tried (b.2)?
What happens if you leave just "eth0" in the interfaces line? Is that 192.168.0.0/24 network perhaps brought up later in the boot process, so that when samba tries to start, it doesn't exist yet? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690684 Title: samba panic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1690684/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
